Description
🎧 Listen to this article:
Why Voters Reject Richard Marles US War
Are Australia’s security agencies protecting the public or shielding power?
Discover how ASIO and the police are used to control dissent, not safeguard democracy.
Prefer to listen? Press play above or download the MP3.
Introduction
Darwin, 4:42 a.m., June 2025. KC-46 tankers lift off from RAAF Base Darwin, refuelling U.S. bombers returning from a strike on Iranian nuclear sites. Veteran Ron McKinnon, 71, stares from his porch. “Here we go again,” he mutters, haunted by his service in Iraq.
Just hours later, Defence Minister Richard Marles appears on ABC News: “Australia stands shoulder to shoulder with our ally.” Foreign Minister Penny Wong echoes him. But the public mood is shifting fast, as concerns over the Richard Marles US war agenda grow louder.
Problem: Australians no longer trust Canberra’s war decisions.
Agitate: The Iran strike has deepened fears of entanglement in endless U.S. wars.
Solution: Voters now demand a sovereign, peaceful defence policy—and they’re ready to make it an election issue.
PROBLEM – Public Trust Collapse Over U.S. Military Alignment
1. Polls Signal a Sea Change
• 40% of Australians now believe we should distance ourselves from the U.S. (Lowy Institute, 2025)
• Only 26% say we should follow the U.S. into military conflicts.
• 74% oppose involvement in a future war with Iran or China, reflecting a growing rejection of the Richard Marles US war direction.
2. The Trigger: Iran Strike
Australia’s support for the June 2025 U.S. strike on Iran shocked many voters. While the government called it a “measured response,” Australians viewed it as another unjustified conflict.
3. Personal Voices
Ella Tait, an ICU nurse from Newcastle, recalls messaging her brother at RAAF Tindal: “Are you being deployed?” He didn’t reply for hours. Online, #MarlesWarMachine trended as thousands shared anti-war posts.
“We save lives in hospitals, not bomb people across the world,” Ella said.
4. Strategic Concerns
• Pine Gap may have been used to assist the Iran targeting
• Darwin and Tindal bases make Australia a first-strike target in future retaliations
• Experts warn Australia’s role in U.S. wars increases—not decreases—our risk
Consequences of Following the U.S. War Machine
1. Economic Trade-Offs
• AUKUS subs will cost taxpayers $368 billion over 30 years
• Meanwhile, public housing, health, and disaster funding suffer under the financial burden of the Richard Marles US war priorities.
• Australia’s dollar sovereignty means we don’t need to choose war over welfare, but our leaders are
2. Voter Backlash
• Greens, Teals, and Independents have made “Peace Vote” pledges
• In 18 marginal electorates, candidates are calling for War Powers reform
• Many voters say: “If Marles won’t represent peace, we’ll find someone who will”, a clear repudiation of the Richard Marles US war stance.
3. Moral Injury
Every new conflict escalates demand for veterans’ services.
• Defence-linked trauma spikes 19% during combat support operations
• Public sympathy for veterans turns into public anger at those who sent them
“It’s not anti-troop to be anti-war,” says veteran Ron. “It’s anti-stupidity.”
A Peace-First Defence Strategy
1. Use Australia’s Monetary Power for Peace
As a sovereign currency issuer, Australia can fund:
• Fire & flood resilience
• National mental health services
• Cyber defence and coastal radar
No foreign wars required.
2. Model Countries
• Costa Rica abolished its military in 1948 and outperforms neighbours on education & health
• Austria maintains military neutrality and invests heavily in civil defence
• Ireland avoids entangling alliances yet contributes to UN peacekeeping missions, offering a powerful contrast to Richard Marles US war framework.
3. A Legislative Blueprint
A new, independent body could investigate and publicly review Pine Gap’s involvement in past conflicts such as the Iraq and Iran strikes, both tied to Richard Marles US war alignment.
Peace Policy Roadmap: A legislative alternative to Richard Marles US war approach, focused on sovereignty, diplomacy, and the public good.
• Defence of Australia Act – Bans combat beyond 1,000 nm (1,852 km) without a referendum
• War Powers Tribunal – Reviews Pine Gap’s role in Iraq & Iran
• Universal Housing & Health Fund – Redirect defence funds toward social programs
• Pacific Peace Office – Expands diplomacy and soft power in the region
Voter Toolkit
TheyVoteForYou.org.au – Track MPs’ war‑powers votes.
Peace Vote Scorecard – Coming July 2028, this printable guide will rank candidates on their positions regarding U.S. wars, the Iran strike, and military independence.
Use it to: Identify candidates in your electorate, compare peace-first policies, and share with others before voting.
Postal‑Vote Plan – Vote early and informed.
Steps: Apply early via the AEC, review the Peace Vote Scorecard, cast your ballot from home without the pressure of last-minute campaigns, and post it back promptly.
Pro tip: Encourage friends and neighbours to do the same—early voting reduces fear-based tactics.
Quote Cards – Use these short, emotional quotes to spark discussion:
Share them on Facebook, X, or Instagram.
Print and post in cafés, community boards, or at local events.
Use them in personal conversations to advocate for peace.
Quote Card #1“Alliances should defend Australians, not draft them.” – Ron McKinnon
Quote Card #2“Peace is patriotic when sovereignty is at stake.” – Ella Tait
The 2028 Election as a Referendum on War
The Richard Marles U.S. war machine has become a liability. From Iran to AUKUS, Australians are demanding accountability, peace, and independence. As trust erodes, voters reject the Richard Marles US war strategy, calling for a complete redefinition of Australian defence priorities.
This election, they’re not just voting for candidates—they’re voting against wars they never agreed to.
Q&A – Your Questions Answered
Q1. Is it realistic for Australia to defend itself without U.S. support, especially given the growing criticism of Richard Marles US war dependency??
Yes. Independent defence strategies include advanced radar, sovereign missile systems, and civil defence training—all of which are affordable under our monetary sovereignty.
Q2. Could cutting military ties hurt trade?
Neutral nations, such as Switzerland and Austria, maintain robust trade by focusing on diplomacy and economic cooperation, rather than military alignment.
Q3. What is war powers reform?
It would require Parliament—not the Prime Minister—to authorise overseas combat. This puts war decisions in the hands of voters’ representatives.
CALL TO ACTION
Do you believe Australia should follow the U.S. into foreign wars, or reject Richard Marles US war agenda and chart an independent path?
Leave a comment, share your story, and join the Peace Vote movement.
Closing Engagement & Support Block
If you found this article insightful, you can explore more on political reform and Australia’s monetary sovereignty at Social Justice Australia.
Share this article with your community to help drive the conversation toward a more just and equal society.
Click on our Reader Feedback page. Please let us know how our content has inspired you. Submit your testimonial and help shape the conversation today!
Curious what others think? Please read what our readers are saying on our Reader Testimonials page: https://socialjusticeaustralia.com.au/reader-testimonials/
Additionally, leave a comment about this article below.
Support Social Justice Australia – Help Keep This Platform Running
Social Justice Australia is committed to delivering independent, in-depth analysis of critical issues affecting Australians. Unlike corporate-backed media, we rely on our readers to sustain this platform.
If you find value in our content, consider making a small donation to help cover the costs of hosting, maintenance and continued research. No matter how small, every contribution makes a real difference in keeping this site accessible and ad-free.
Your support helps:
✅ Keep this website running without corporate influence
✅ Fund research and publishing of articles that challenge the status quo
✅ Expand awareness of policies that affect everyday Australians
💰 A one-time or monthly donation ensures Social Justice Australia stays a strong, independent voice.
🔗 Donate Now
If you value our work, please leave a quick Google Review here and help others discover us.
https://g.page/r/Cf72h_5fXcalEBM/review
I am deeply grateful for your support and for standing with us in this important movement for truth and justice.
References:
PM Anthony Albanese lies over Iran and contradicts his 2003 Iraq speech
Lowy Institute Poll 2025
ABC News – Australia backs U.S. strikes on Iran
9News – Wong backs U.S. Iran strikes
Guardian – Albanese endorses U.S. ceasefire plan
WSWS – Labor backs attack on Iran